How Ask the Reviewer to Check Your Paper
Latest from our journals
What do editors and reviewers look out for in a paper?
Editors | Reviewers | Researchers
Editors and peer reviewers are of import contributors to the success of your paper. Information technology's therefore vital to empathise what they may exist looking out for in your manuscript.
Every bit an author, yous will have spent weeks, months or perhaps even years preparing your manuscript for submission. Whilst you lot will know the ins and outs of your commodity, the fate of the manuscript, whether information technology exist a inquiry paper, review or case written report, volition lie in the hands of an impartial selection of individuals who are experts in their respective fields, only have no prior knowledge of your manuscript. We are of course referring to our Academic Editors and peer reviewers. The essential cogs in the auto that turns your manuscript into a peer-reviewed publication. It'due south therefore vital to understand who our editors and reviewers are and what they may exist looking out for in your manuscript.
Every Academic Editor on our editorial boards at Hindawi is carefully called, each an adept in their respective field and having a record of published articles of their ain. Our editors are here to ensure that the quality and scope of the journal are maintained while as well ensuring a off-white and thorough peer review procedure for prospective authors.
All papers submitted to whatsoever periodical at Hindawi undergo routine checks during our screening stages earlier getting the dark-green light to be sent to one of our editors for initial assessment. Hither the editor volition meet the newspaper for the first time and will cheque your article on a number of items, such as scientific accuracy, linguistic communication, and whether it is in scope for the journal. This is a primal part of the procedure and should exist of notation to authors. The conclusions in your commodity may exist sound, but, for example, have you as well ensured that the linguistic communication and structure of your paper is consequent with our editorial guidelines? Eva Amsen describes in further detail the most common reasons that papers are rejected at this stage.
Once an editor has decided that your paper is suitable to keep to the next stage, they will then be responsible for selecting and inviting suitable peer reviewers to review the manuscript. This may do this using their ain suggestions, or using our reviewer suggestion tools. While the editor will have an overarching knowledge of the topic area of the journal, information technology is the reviewers who are selected for their specific expertise and agreement of the surface area of research that your paper covers.
Our reviewers will use their expertise to perform a comprehensive review of your paper, providing the editor with an informed recommendation on how the paper should continue. Peer reviewers will propose editors past thoroughly checking the rationale and methodology, and volition verify that the conclusions and statements made in the newspaper are well supported, so that the readers can empathise your findings. This means that several revisions may be needed before your paper can exist published. Your manuscript may also be rejected due to concerns identified by reviewers. In one case all of the peer reviewers have submitted their reports, the Academic Editor will be able to brand a decision on whether your paper will demand minor or major revisions, be rejected at this stage, or if it is now set for publication. Your paper may only need to go through the peer review cycle once, or information technology may demand to go through multiple times depending on the initial feedback that the editor receives and the manner your paper progresses after each revision.
Peer reviewers are not merely hither to provide a simple reject or accept decision for your paper but are, most importantly, hither to assist ameliorate it where necessary. When an author receives a reviewer study asking for revisions, they should take each comment into account and provide a detailed response to each item in their rebuttal letter. This will help to demonstrate to the editor how the paper has been improved and will assist them in determining if the paper is now ready for publication. In certain cases, the editor may send the paper back to the aforementioned reviewer to confirm this, especially where major changes have been made.
Editors and reviewers may also comment on the literature that you've referred to in your references, and may comment on their quality and relevance. Our editors and reviewers are also strongly encouraged to refer to the reporting guideline that you have used in your article, and and then it may be helpful to check our reporting guidelines page when preparing your manuscript in anticipation of your manuscript being assessed against these criteria.
Our editors and peer reviewers are incredibly of import contributors to the success of your paper, helping to ensure readers understand your findings so that they can utilise and cite your article in their own research. Together, this helps to reach our collective goal of aiding the advancement of scientific research.
This web log postal service is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). Illustration adapted from Adobe Stock by David Jury.
Source: https://www.hindawi.com/post/what-do-editors-and-reviewers-look-out-paper/
0 Response to "How Ask the Reviewer to Check Your Paper"
Post a Comment